The mabo cases are some of the most well known cases in the australian legal system, this paper will focus on the mabo v. The decision in a six to one majority, the court held that the people of the murray islands. Where available, the pdfword icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document. Mabo v queensland no 1, was a significant court case decided in the high court of australia on 8 december 1988. Court transcript evaluations mabo and ors v the state of queensland and the commonwealth of australia no. Mabo and others and the state of queensland was a high court native title, constitutional and real property law case involving a series of claims by the meriam peoples for native title of the murray islands a series of islands annexed to the colony of queensland. Mabo v queensland no 2 commonly known as mabo was a landmark high court of australia decision in 1992 recognising native title in australia for the first time. Source case from citation self paced lesson case law. Join us in september as the hon margaret white ao presents an indepth look at one of the most important judgments ever delivered by the high court, mabo v state of queensland no 2 1992 175 clr 1. Click here to download a pdf of the high court case study. Pdf compare the approaches to recognition, proof, and. Mabo, wik and the art of paradigm management by nehal bhuta. Detail from the cover of the mabo v queensland document.
Well, even if youre a case law nut or you take even the smallest interest in world affairs then let me tell you a little bit about. The mabo case began when the plaintiffs, the merriam people of the murray islands in the torres strait initiated proceedings in the high court in 1982, in retort to the queensland amendment act 1982, which established a system of making land grants on trust for aboriginals and torres strait islanders. Home databases worldlii search feedback high court of australia. An unresolved jurisprudence by gerry simpson in this article the author argues that australianjudicial interpretation in relation to the acquisition. Mabo is a massive and prolific case which is discussed in many of the subjects studied. Nor is it understood that the native title act 1993 was primarily aimed not at recognition of native title but to accommodate and give security to every other existing stakeholder in land. Wright, introduction to the law of tenures, 4th ed. It found that the queensland coast islands declaratory act 1985, which attempted to retrospectively abolish native title rights, was not valid according to the racial discrimination act. Guide 0 study mabo pages 1 8 text version fliphtml5. Nor is it understood that the native title act 1993 was primarily aimed not at recognition of native title but to accommodate and give security to every other existing stakeholder in land, so that the.
Mabo v queensland no 2 1992 107 alr 1 1992 107 alr 1 is a parallel citation for mabo v queensland no. Students study the legal system and how it regulates activities and aims to protect the rights of individuals. The high court held that the doctrine of terra nullius, which imported all laws of england to a new land, did not apply in circumstances where there were already inhabitants present even if those inhabitants had been regarded at. The majority judgments in full are the largest, and perhaps also the plainest in appearance, of australias key constitutional documents. In response, eddie mabo and his fellow applicants were left with no choice but to challenge the validity of the legislation in the high court if they wanted their case to continue, which they did in june 1985. Sir harry gibbs legal heritage centre supreme court. This recognition inserted the legal doctrine of native title into australian. Five things you should know about the mabo decision the. To maintain the pages relevant and succinct, we have a dedicated mabo page for each one of the subjects in which it is covered, which only contains the issues relevant to that subject. The legal decision was made by the high court on 3 june 1992. Mabo v state of queensland no 2 university of queensland. The high court held that the doctrine of terra nullius, which imported all laws of england to a new land, did not apply in circumstances where there were already inhabitants present even if those inhabitants had. Later in 1992, mabo was awarded the australian human rights medal for his work over many years to gain legal recognition for indigenous peoples rights.
Implications of the mabo queensland that the meriam people were entitled as decision. Queensland iis recognition of indigenous peoples rights to their. Oct 03, 2016 the selden society 2016 lecture series continues with the hon margaret white ao on mabo v state of queensland no 2 1992 175 clr 1. Five things you should know about the mabo decision the university of sydney. Recent decisions noteup help mabo v queensland 1988 hca 69. Mabo v queensland no 2 commonly known as mabo was a landmark high court of. The facts of the case the australian high court decision in mabo v. Using the url or doi link below will ensure access to this page indefinitely. Wik peoples v queensland 1996 hca 40, in which the high court ruled that native title and pastoral rights could coexist.
It also describes the broad historical process to which mabo and his legal action made their distinctive contribution. The state of queensland and another 1989 166 clr 186 f. State of queensland 1992 was both good news and bad news for indigenous people. Mabo is a massive and prolific case which is discussed in many of the subjects offered on this site. Eddie mabo simple english wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Jul 08, 2008 in this article, the author considers the extent to which the cases of mabo v. Queensland, a case that was litigated over for almost a decade in the australian high court, this case was a monumental step for indigenous people in australia. The judges assumed for the time being that the kind of rights claimed in the case did in fact exist.
It is not widely understood that the high court decision in the case mabo and others v. In june 1992, the australian high court handed down its judgement in the landmark case of mabo v queensland no. Mabo v queensland detailed case brief, including paragraphpage references property law. The end of terra nullius, the beginning of native title.
It is short for mabo and others v queensland no 2 1992. The first question was whether the meriam people did have traditional rights and. It is a measure of the massive importance of the decision in eddie mabo and others v queensland that vast amounts of work evaluating its. Australian native title anthropology 12 native title bill was demanded by many as a means to ensure certainty in the face of doubts as to the legal status of land assumed since first. In mabo v queensland no 1 1988 the high court found that the legislation passed by the queensland government was invalid as it was.
June 1992 bearing the name mabo v state of queensland no 2,1 is. The mabo case the mabo decision altered the foundation of land law in australia by overturning the doctrine of terra nullius land belonging to noone on which british claims to possession of australia were based. Return to origini results q new search edit search next results mabo v mark mabo v queensland no 2 mabo v queensland mabo v queensland mabo v queensland newsroom proview ebooks return to original results document alert centre search folders my contacts history term q c classifications onty mabo v queensland no 2. Mabo v queensland no 2 mabo no 22 was the first occasion in which a claim of preexisting indigenous3 interests in land in australia was squarely before the high court, and the litigation necessarily raised issues surrounding the acquisition of sovereignty over the new hollandaustralian territories by great britain. In 2016 she presented in the 2016 selden society lecture series leading cases of the common law mabo v state of queensland no 2, published by the supreme court library queensland. The case was decided by the supreme court of the northern territory in 1971. It was a divisive yet important step toward recognising indigenous rights and establishing native title. Mabo v queensland pdf mabo v queensland no 2 mabo case 1992 hca 23 1992. Mabo, wik and the art of paradigm management by nehal. The high court is the highest court in australias judicial system. The mabo case began when the plaintiffs, the merriam people of the murray islands in the torres strait initiated proceedings in the high court in 1982, in retort to the queensland amendment act 1982, which. The wider significance of mabo v queensland, 17 no 4 alternative l.
Mabo v queensland no 2 wikipedia republished wiki 2. The high court rejected the doctrine of terra nullius, in favour of the common law doctrine of aboriginal title, and overruled milirrpum v nabalco pty ltd 1971, a contrary decision of the supreme court of the northern territory. Rights high court overturns 200 years of common law. Mabo v state of queensland 1992 66aljr408 the recognition of native title by the full court of the high court of australia in mabo v queensland 3 june 1992 is an important development in the relationship between australias indigenous people and its european settlers. The mabo case overview the mabo decision altered the foundation of land law in australia by overturning the doctrine of terra nullius land belonging to noone on which british claims to possession of australia. Mabo v queensland no 1 wikimili, the free encyclopedia. Margaret white ao acted as junior counsel for the queensland government for the ten years of litigation.
Find out the five things you should know about the decision. Aboriginal selfdetermination and indigenous land title in postmabo. The case was heard over ten years, progressing from the queensland supreme court to the high court of australia. The mabo decision changed australias concept of land ownership. That decision is now commonly called mabo v queensland in australia and is widely recognised for its importance. Queensland no 2 leading cases of the common law mabo v state of queensland no 2 1992 175 clr 1 presented by the hon margaret white ao selden society australian chapter cordially invites you to lecture four in our 2016 lecture series thursday 22 september 2016, 5.
Foundations of the legal system, 2nd ed, melbourne, oxford university press, 2009, pp. Mabo v queensland overturning the doctrine of terra nullius. Aboriginal selfdetermination and indigenous land title in. Download this paper open pdf in browser add paper to my library. For more information on selden society lecture series visit. The decision was the judgment of the high court in mabo v queensland no 21. Mabo v queensland no 2 laws2381 property, equity and. Exhibits relating to the crowns defence mabo and ors v the state of queensland and the commonwealth of australia no. Mabo v queensland no 2 mabo case 1992 hca 23, 1992 175 clr 1 1992.
On the 3rd of june 1992, the high court ruled by a majority of six to one that the meriam people were entitled as against the. Jun 02, 2017 the 1992 mabo decision was a significant milestone in australias history. The national library of australias copies direct service lets you purchase higher quality, larger sized photocopies or electronic copies of newspapers pages clicking on the order now button below will open the ordering form in a new window which will. High court overturns 200 years of common law mabo v queensland no 2 1992 facts of the case the murray islands are a group of three islands mer, dauar and waier that lie in the torres strait in. It found that the queensland coast islands declaratory act 1985, which attempted to retrospectively abolish native title rights, was not valid according to the racial discrimination act 1975. Nevertheless, it appears that the queensland authorities exercised some. When a proposal to expand the maritime boundaries of queensland to include these islands was under consideration, commander. Edward koiki mabo and the decision of the high court of australia, rendered in 1992, known asmabo v. Mabo v queensland no 2 mabo case 1992 hca 23, 1992. High court overturns 200 years of common law mabo v queensland no 2 1992 facts of the case the murray islands are a group of three islands mer, dauar and waier that lie in the torres strait in northern queensland. We are currently trying to work out how to include all the information relevant to all the. I have no doubt at all that the decision of the high court of australia handed down on 3. Free essays on mabo v queensland no 2 case brief brainia. Rights high court overturns 200 years of common law australian.
791 249 94 92 1211 1591 114 635 871 1120 11 627 1547 464 855 1089 753 1004 964 105 158 1123 1105 1070 470 570 1195 518 842 966 1203 130 1369 1432 1320 1145